Most tools on the market do not calculate by number of jobs, but by volume. The more words the higher the cost. If you have jobs that have been specifically cited in your work, you should remove them before uploading them. You should also include your bibliography, as the program tries to take these into account and this only works with the sources. However, mapping and table directories are not considered, so you can leave these out to save costs.
After the upload, you can once again see the specified sources that you have specified in the bibliography. There are also other options to check your upload again. By clicking on the Start button the message appears that so-called “ScanCredits” are to be acquired. We first had to recharge our account, with the purchase function somewhat hidden. After a few minutes this is done and the exam can begin.
What does the result of a plagiarism check look like?
As a rule, such a plagiarism test takes about half an hour. In our master’s thesis, a result of 8% came out. For the first time meaningless why we throw a look into the Plagaware documentary on the subject of assessment of plagiarism. According to the statement, the number results in the number of words not found in the given sources in proportion to the total number of words in the work. There is no traffic light system with this tool, but only the indication that the number is not significant. Rather, the way in which the texts are taken is of importance. Generally you should not rely blindly on any traffic lights. Instead, you should look in detail at the results and edit.
What is something? (At plagiarism check)
As expected, the program has recognized all public electronic sources and marked them in the text. If we now click on the marked source, the original will not be opened, but only a representation of which sections have been copied. This is very clear and we can see if and how much a source has been changed.
In contrast, detecting known sources does not work so well. Although the program recognizes references given in the bibliography such as e.g. (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12239-017-0027-3), however, the tool has problems with “correct” bibliographical references, e.g. (“Coordinated control of ESC and AFS with adaptive algorithms, S.Yim, in International Journal of Automotive Technology (2017)”). This is not a problem since you can mark the source as “already specified” with one click. Also, the tool marks irrelevant “sources” such as the affidavit that you wrote the work independently.
Overall, plagiarism checkers are pretty good at finding the sources of a thesis and presenting their revisions. You only have to help with the interpretation of the results, because the programs are not yet far enough to make this completely error-free these days. Therefore, when choosing your tool you should make sure that manual interpretation and editing are possible.
Plagiarism check: Here again the summary
Even if these tools make your work much easier, they are not a miracle and all-purpose weapon against faulty references. Instead, you should only see these programs as pure support that you can use to continuously improve your work. So do not rely on any traffic lights and check the sites themselves again exactly.
Be sure to read the terms and conditions and privacy by before uploading anything. Pay particular attention to whether you can delete the file at any time and that you retain the rights to your text. If this is not the case, then you should look for another tool.
You should never expect a simple program to find all the sources of literature that exist. Although plagiarism checkers are good at finding freely accessible electronic sources, they can only find a limited amount of paid literature. Printed books are e.g. not found. Also differ the respective databases of each provider, which may result in two different results may result in the same file.
Plagiarism signals are by no means reliable. In the end, your auditor will still decide on your work. The tools also do not pay attention to the specific rules of your exam regulations.
Save your work as plain text. Because the programs are not able to check pictures, tables and diagrams directories. This saves time and bandwidth, makes the tool easier to work with and improves. You also save money here, as usually the amount of the uploaded file is charged.
Never copy from other theses! Most university plagiarism checkers may involve previous exams. If you do an exam yourself, these sources will not be found.
Include the URL of your sources. Good tools use these to check whether you have specified the places correctly or not.
Be sure to check your verified text for free or make another paid check necessary. Some plagiarism checkers (not all) allow you to specifically exclude sources. This function becomes necessary if you have already published your work or parts of it and you want to exclude “false positives”.